1965 Honda S600 vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Honda S600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Honda S600 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (301 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1965 Honda S600. (56 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 Honda S600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1781 kg more than 1965 Honda S600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Honda S600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Honda S600. (52 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Honda S600. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1965 Honda S600 has manual transmission. 1965 Honda S600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Honda S600 | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Honda | Land Rover |
Model | S600 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 606 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 705 kg | 2486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 88 L |