1965 Humber Sceptre vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,725 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Humber Sceptre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Humber Sceptre (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Humber Sceptre should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Humber Sceptre weights approximately 325 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Humber Sceptre (144 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1965 Humber Sceptre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Humber Sceptre | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Humber | Zastava |
| Model | Sceptre | 102 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1725 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2160 mm |
