1965 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1965 Isuzu Bellel. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1965 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Isuzu Bellel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1965 Isuzu Bellel has manual transmission. 1965 Isuzu Bellel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Isuzu Bellel | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Isuzu | Ford |
Model | Bellel | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |