1965 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 151 kg more than 1965 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1965 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Isuzu Bellel. (159 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Isuzu Bellel | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | Bellel | C30 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 159 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |