1965 Isuzu Bellett vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1965 Isuzu Bellett. (76 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1965 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 794 kg more than 1965 Isuzu Bellett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (372 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Isuzu Bellett. (114 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Isuzu Bellett | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
Model | Bellett | CTS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1471 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 114 Nm | 372 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 68 L |