1965 Jaguar MK II vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1976 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 970 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar MK II | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | MK II | Fronte |
Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 42 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 30 L |