1965 Jaguar MK II vs. 1984 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1984 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 300 kg more than 1984 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1965 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar MK II | 1984 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Jaguar | Plymouth |
Model | MK II | Reliant |
Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2260 mm |