1965 Jaguar MK X vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1965 Jaguar MK X is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 30 kg more than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar MK X | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Jaguar | Rolls-Royce |
Model | MK X | Phantom |
Year Released | 1965 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 5673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 164 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 114.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 6.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3690 mm |