1965 Jaguar MK X vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1965 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1965 Jaguar MK X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 1212 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lotus Emme. (354 Nm). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar MK X | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | MK X | Emme |
Year Released | 1965 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 354 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2770 mm |