1965 Jaguar MK X vs. 2001 Mazda 6
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 515 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar MK X | 2001 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK X | 6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |