1965 Jaguar MK X vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Acura CSX. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 577 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Jaguar MK X | 2009 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Jaguar | Acura |
| Model | MK X | CSX |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
