1965 Jaguar Type S vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar Type S weights approximately 78 kg more than 1989 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Jaguar Type S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Jaguar Type S | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | Type S | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3440 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 57 L |
