1965 Jaguar Type S vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar Type S (208 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar Type S should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1965 Jaguar Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar Type S | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | Type S | TL |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3440 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2840 mm |