1965 Jaguar Type S vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar Type S (208 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Ford S-Max. (202 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar Type S should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford S-Max.
Because 1965 Jaguar Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jaguar Type S | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | Type S | S-Max |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3440 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |