1965 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1965 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1965 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 1965 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ5 | MPV |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2850 mm |