1965 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1965 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1965 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1965 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W has automatic transmission and 1965 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1965 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Jeep CJ5 | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Jeep | SsangYong |
| Model | CJ5 | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2970 mm |
