1965 Jensen Interceptor vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Proton 300 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 4,473 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jensen Interceptor (238 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jensen Interceptor should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jensen Interceptor weights approximately 235 kg more than 2000 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Jensen Interceptor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jensen Interceptor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Jensen Interceptor | 2000 Proton 300 | |
Make | Jensen | Proton |
Model | Interceptor | 300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4473 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2450 mm |