1965 Jensen Interceptor vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 4,473 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jensen Interceptor (238 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jensen Interceptor should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1965 Jensen Interceptor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jensen Interceptor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Jensen Interceptor | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jensen | Ford |
| Model | Interceptor | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4473 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |
