1965 Lancia Flavia vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1965 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1965 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 46 kg more than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lancia Flavia | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Flavia | Celica |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 55 L |