1965 Lancia Flavia vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Micra. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Micra weights approximately 292 kg more than 1965 Lancia Flavia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lancia Flavia | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Lancia | Nissan |
Model | Flavia | Micra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 46 L |