1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 1986 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1986 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1986 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1986 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1556 kg more than 1986 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lincoln Continental | 1986 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Lincoln | Skoda |
Model | Continental | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1965 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 47 L |