1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1994 Rover Range Rover is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (134 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 291 kg more than 1994 Rover Range Rover. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Lincoln | Rover |
| Model | Continental | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2750 mm |
