1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2002 Porsche Cayenne
To start off, 2002 Porsche Cayenne is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Porsche Cayenne (443 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Porsche Cayenne should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 51 kg more than 2002 Porsche Cayenne.
Because 2002 Porsche Cayenne is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Porsche Cayenne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2002 Porsche Cayenne | |
| Make | Lincoln | Porsche |
| Model | Continental | Cayenne |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4511 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 443 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 100 L |
