1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom (454 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 79 kg more than 1965 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Lincoln | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Continental | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 6749 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 454 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 6090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 100 L |
