1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Outback. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 850 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Lincoln | Subaru |
| Model | Continental | Outback |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 1556 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 64 L |
