1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (189 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1016 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Continental | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 61 L |
