1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 70 kg more than 1965 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
| Model | Continental | Armada |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |
