1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lincoln Continental | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Lincoln | Toyota |
Model | Continental | Ractis |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |