1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (270 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1215 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Continental | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 76 L |
