1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 955 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | Continental | C30 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |