1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (294 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 831 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Lincoln | Kia |
| Model | Continental | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 3300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 294 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2845 mm |
