1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL (335 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL weights approximately 19 kg more than 1965 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lincoln Continental | 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL | |
Make | Lincoln | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Continental | GL |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1989 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1839 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3076 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 100 L |