1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2013 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2013 GMC Acadia is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 284 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 203 kg more than 2013 GMC Acadia.
Because 2013 GMC Acadia is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 GMC Acadia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2013 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | Lincoln | GMC |
| Model | Continental | Acadia |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2203 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5101 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2003 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1846 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 83 L |
