1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2013 GMC Sierra. (192 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2013 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 135 kg more than 2013 GMC Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Lincoln | GMC |
| Model | Continental | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 192 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2271 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5702 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2031 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1875 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3378 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 129 L |
