1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. (281 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 560 kg more than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lincoln Continental | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Lincoln | Jeep |
| Model | Continental | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7048 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 1846 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4161 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1839 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |
