1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 2013 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2013 Nissan Titan is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Titan (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 192 kg more than 2013 Nissan Titan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lincoln Continental | 2013 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Continental | Titan |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 313 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 2214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5704 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2019 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1895 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |