1965 Lotus 33 vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 719 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33.
Because 1965 Lotus 33 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus 33. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus 33 | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Lotus | Plymouth |
Model | 33 | Sundance |
Year Released | 1965 | 1985 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1175 kg |