1965 Lotus 33 vs. 2004 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2004 MG ZT-T is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus 33 (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT-T. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus 33 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT-T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT-T weights approximately 1169 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33.
Because 1965 Lotus 33 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus 33. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lotus 33 | 2004 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | Lotus | MG |
| Model | 33 | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 10800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1625 kg |
