1965 Lotus 33 vs. 2006 Proton Satria
To start off, 2006 Proton Satria is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Proton Satria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus 33 (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2006 Proton Satria. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus 33 should accelerate faster than 2006 Proton Satria.
Because 1965 Lotus 33 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus 33. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Proton Satria has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus 33 has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Proton Satria will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lotus 33 | 2006 Proton Satria | |
| Make | Lotus | Proton |
| Model | 33 | Satria |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 10800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
