1965 Lotus 33 vs. 2009 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Sable (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1965 Lotus 33. (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 1469 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus 33. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus 33 has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus 33 | 2009 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Lotus | Mercury |
Model | 33 | Sable |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 10800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1925 kg |