1965 Lotus 33 vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1965 Lotus 33. (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1540 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus 33. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus 33 has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus 33 | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | 33 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 10800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1996 kg |