1965 Lotus 33 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1965 Lotus 33. (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus 33 has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: