1965 Lotus 33 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1965 Lotus 33. (212 HP @ 10800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1914 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus 33. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lotus 33 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Lotus | Jaguar |
| Model | 33 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 10800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 2370 kg |
