1965 Lotus Elan vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1968 Zastava 1300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Lotus | Zastava |
Model | Elan | 1300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |