1965 Lotus Elan vs. 1974 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1974 Toyota Celica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1974 Toyota Celica. (78 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1974 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Toyota Celica weights approximately 310 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 1974 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | Celica |
Year Released | 1965 | 1974 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |