1965 Lotus Elan vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Lotus | Oldsmobile |
Model | Elan | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |