1965 Lotus Elan vs. 1988 Volvo 480
To start off, 1988 Volvo 480 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,721 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Volvo 480 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Volvo 480 (108 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Volvo 480 should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Volvo 480 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 1988 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Elan | 480 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |