1965 Lotus Elan vs. 1996 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 1996 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan Terrano II (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Because 1996 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lotus Elan | 1996 Nissan Terrano II | |
| Make | Lotus | Nissan |
| Model | Elan | Terrano II |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
