1965 Lotus Elan vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 606 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Lotus Elan | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Lotus | Nissan |
| Model | Elan | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2830 mm |
