1965 Lotus Elan vs. 1999 Rover 200
To start off, 1999 Rover 200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1999 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rover 200 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lotus Elan | 1999 Rover 200 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Elan | 200 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2510 mm |